Without knowing who and what we are
as Americans, truth is but a dream...
America did not get into the shape
it is in by accident. There is a sound science to wrest control of government
from the people, and our founders emphatically warned us. They might be proud
that we made it this far, but would now shake us soundly. The enemy is no
longer at the gates, but have made their nest inside of our own government.
You see, what a political group
calls themselves no longer matters today, it is what they do that will
determine who they are, and what they should be called. America is on the verge
of collapse, our liberties strangled, our
constitution shredded, and government is to blame... They, and our own ignorant
laziness...
There are some now in the White
House who should be tried for treason, though at this time they are so
powerful, backed by such managed control outside of our country, they are now
untouchable. To take our country back, to put it on the right track once again,
we will have to organize like never before seen in this country... There is
hope, and the suggestion presented below is the only sure avenue to win... It
won't be easy, but nothing of substance, nothing of true value, is. Isn't
America worth the effort?
First, we must see the enemy.... We
must look into his eyes, and though this may seem a bit uncomfortable to
consider, but only a mirror could do that...
Our own worst enemy might be our
ignorance, or our lethargic and trusting nature that has woven itself into the
American fabric. But it is more than that. We are being played, and one thing
that will rouse us out of our slumber more than anything else is that... Americans do not like to
be played as fools...
It may not be necessary to truly
know the enemy, he is far too complicated, and can change his stripes at will.
Like a chameleon, this entity can pull and push us, and wants us to believe
that he can destroy us at will, and for some, this fear is most paralyzing...
There is only one way to fight an adversary like this, an antagonist who hides
in the folds, and has no conscience. Before anything, from truth to action, we
must know who we are. Like nothing else, a national identity will give us
everything we need, and if we could adhere to that, we would be unstoppable.
America could once again be a shining beacon to the world.
If we could define ourselves
collectively, as Americans, we could vote into office those who reflect these
views... If they are found lying, or corrupt, we should oust them and fast,
even before they can finish term. We have no choice but to play hard-ball now.
Why? Because they do, the power they weld, puts our very existence is at
stake... Indeed, America is broke, we have an eroded infrastructure, and we
have significantly lost the ability produce... We are consumers, not
producers... and this must change.
Of all of the definitions in political
philosophy, from the Right to Left, the Liberal, the Progressive, the Neo Con,
the one American Political Philosophy that has been most harmed is the
Paleocon. And for good reason. It is the basis of American Conservatism, and
our true hope to take America back.
It isn't taught in our
liberal/progressive/socialistic universities for a reason. It takes the power
from a top-heavy central government and gives it back to the people, the
strength, the truth, and the light of America.
So what is a Paleo-conservative?
Paleo-conservatism, or a Paleocon,
is a conservative political philosophy found mostly in the United States. It is
the framework that made us the greatest nation ever to exist on this earth,
where freedom, liberty, moral and ethical value, and the very laws of our Republic were struck It was a
place where the prosperity of capitalism flourished, and was the shining ideal
that made us the envy of the world.
Its principles are what was once
termed "the great experiment" and it stressed American traditional
family values, individual responsibility, honor, loyalty, and self pride for
hard work and a job well done.
It is the revival of our original
conservative ideal.
It advocates a limited and non-intrusive
government, a civil society based on moral law, anti nationalism, and
anti-federalism. It advocates a small but well-defined federal government,
dominated by a stronger state government, and generally favors confederation.
Our early Paleocons were "anti-federalists" and this ideal later
became the Confederacy of the United States.
Understand and note here that Paleo-conservatism does not necessarily adhere to any particular party line.
It is dynamic, both collective and personal, and takes historical precedence
from both kin and culture.
Opposed to neoconservatives, they
have emphatic disagreement on issues such as immigration, affirmative action,
open housing, the funding of allies abroad, foreign wars (especially
undeclared), and further criticize both social welfare and social democracy.
They also refer negatively to the "welfare-warfare state," "the
bias and racism of Church-State," and opposes government dominance by
propaganda, taboo, and deception that promotes "slavery of the
spirit," referred to as "polite totalitarianism."
Paleo-conservatives view their
political philosophy to be fundamental and legitimately American, a typical
American conservative tradition that dates back to our framers, to the very
core of our Republic based on Law.
To further understand Paleo-conservative
though read the Rockford Institute's Chronicles: A Magazine of American
Culture, where Pat Buchanan became, early in his life, a staunch advocate. He
helped create another renowned Paleocon publication called The American
Conservative, trying to revive the Libertarian standard we once were. Single
Issues by Joseph Sobran, also defined social conservatism as expressed in
the late 20th century.
Though most Americans are swept
along by their immediate wants and needs, some, so disenfranchised and
disenchanted, refuse steadfastly to participate in the system. And what the
Obama administration is advocating is becoming more and more clear to all: The
Progressives and Neocons on both sides of the isle have the same mindset, gig
dominating government, with country populated with easily controlled people..
There is a revival of
Paleo-conservatism in the grass-root "Tea-Party" movement, though
most cannot yet identify with that ideal, or even define the term.
None-the-less, the idiom Paleocon is at the center of this movement, and is the
strength and conviction we need to win our country back.
You see...
When we get to the point when we can
define who and what we are, we will find the path open and unimpeded. You
see... it is an old and emphatic idiom: the world gets out of the way for
anything self directed, especially a righteous cause. And yes,
Paleo-conservatism is only one of many paths America has and can take. There
are many, but this ideal is the true essence of what promoted liberty and the
American dream. Read about that in The Federalist Papers.
Author's note: Wikipedia: James
Burnham, left an important influence on paleocons, especially on Samuel
Francis. Paul Gottfried said that the two men believed that social forces
create ideologies—and that "moral visions are the mere accompaniments of
the process by which classes make themselves economically dominant and try to
control other groups."[130]
Burmham wrote in 1967:
"In real life, men are joined
on a much less than universal scale into a variety of groupings—family,
community, church, business, club, party, etc.—which on the political scale
reach the maximum significant limit in the nation. Since there is at present
time no Humanity or Mankind (socially and historically speaking), there cannot
be a World Government—though conceivably there could be a world empire."
Core beliefs from Wikipedia: The
prefix paleo derives from the Greek root palaeo- meaning "ancient" or
"old". It is somewhat tongue-in-cheek—and refers to the paleocons'
claim to represent a more historic, authentic conservative tradition than that
found in neoconservative. Adherents of paleoconservatism often describe
themselves simply as "paleo-." Rich Lowry of National Review claims
the prefix "is designed to obscure the fact that it is a recent
ideological creation of post-Cold War politics."[13]
The paleoconservatives use the
suffix conservative somewhat differently from some American opponents of
Leftism. Paleocons may reject attempts by Rush Limbaugh and others to graft short-term
policy goals—such as school choice, enterprise zones, and faith-based
initiatives—into the core of conservatism. This is mainly due to the
paleoconservative's desire to see these incorporated as long-term institutional
goals, rather than short-term victories for the movement itself. In this way,
paleocons are generally regarded as taking the "long view" toward
American conservatism, willing to suffer temporary setbacks while never taking
their aim off the goal of establishing the primacy of conservative thought into
American politics.[14]
Moreover, Samuel T. Francis, Thomas
Fleming and some other paleocons de-emphasized the "conservative"
part of the "paleoconservative" label, saying that they do not want
the status quo preserved.[15][16] Fleming and Paul Gottfried called such
thinking "stupid tenacity" and described it as "a series of
trenches dug in defense of last year's revolution."[17] Francis defined
authentic conservatism as "the survival and enhancement of a particular
people and its institutionalized cultural expressions."[18] He said of the
paleoconservative movement:
What paleoconservatism tries to tell
Americans is that the dominant forces in their society are no longer committed
to conserving the traditions, institutions, and values that created and formed
it, and, therefore, that those who are really conservative in any serious sense
and wish to live under those traditions, institutions, and values need to
oppose the dominant forces and form new ones.[19]
The earliest mention of the word paleoconservative
listed in Nexis is a use in the October 20, 1984, issue of The Nation,
referring to academic economists who allegedly work to redefine poverty.[20]
The American Heritage Dictionary (fourth edition) lists a generic, informal use
of the term, meaning "extremely or stubbornly conservative in political
matters." Outside of the United States, the word is sometimes spelled
palaeoconservative.[21]
No comments:
Post a Comment